tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6755920586116700055.post4234333461753935773..comments2023-10-03T13:35:15.576+02:00Comments on Alan Osler's page: Quiz of the centuryAlan Oslerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16259733321472312373noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6755920586116700055.post-45371516046080664872007-08-29T14:57:00.000+02:002007-08-29T14:57:00.000+02:00This isn't correct, and its statistically provable...This isn't correct, and its statistically provable that in fact George Bush is a much bigger wanker than you think. <BR/><BR/>Firstly, consider that in the US, relatively few people actually know what the word 'wanker' actually means. So, your survey removes the great American populuation from the debate. If you search Tony Blair/George Bush + jerk, you get roughly 1.5m responses for Bush, and 348k for Blair. Ergo, Bush is 4.3 x a bigger wanker. Or something. Secondly, if you use a term usable both sides of the pond: George Bush + cock gets 1.6m results, whereas Tony Blair + cock gets 472k, which suggests a more general agreement.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com